Threshold
NAY for me.
See previous discussion at https://basilisk.subsquare.io/treasury/proposals/10 (and on Telegram on those dates) which wasn't satisfactory imo. If the audit is possible, let's do it together with other chains using the same service (it would help to see your total deployment costs and total revenue for/from all parachains together), otherwise I suggest we negotiate some lower tier service level and price, because (as stated previously), the expenses don't seem commesurated to the observed activity on the chain, ie. ~9 millions requests per day reported by you is not coherent with any of the on-chain activity metrics at https://basilisk.subscan.io/tools/charts .
It could be due to spam or yourself inflating the numbers to increase your ask. Sorry but it's time to challenge you a bit because current bills are too high for the current chain fees, ie. unsustainable. We should lower the costs until we can't increase revenues. The quality of service may be reduced for the time being until we find a new equilibrium. If possible, please offer an alternative.
Also, this time I can't find the rationale for the pricing in the linked document. Please include it so people know how you calculated the total due for each month.
Edited
AYE - this is in-line with the ongoing agreed costs for maintaining these services